|
There
are approximately 173 faculty positions on governance committees, 24
Senate positions, 80 positions on task forces, nine Guild officer
positions, and 20 hiring committee positions (this year) beyond division
members. Altogether, that adds to 306 voluntary spots full-time faculty
can fill to help govern our campus. Given 241 full-time faculty, and
ignoring the important fact that many adjunct faculty participate in
campus governance, 306 spots divided by 241 faculty is approximately
1.27 spots per faculty. Basically,
if each full-time
faculty member volunteered for one governance, Senate, or Guild
appointment, we would cover all the governance responsibilities on our
campus. Sadly, only 141 of GCC’s
241 full-time faculty (which is approximately 60% of our full-time
faculty) volunteered to serve this year in governance, Guild, or Senate.
And, 25% of those 141 full-time faculty members serve on more than one
committee; the author serves on the Senate and six additional
committees.
When I come
home at the end of a day of work at Glendale College, I often tell my
wife that I am physically, emotionally, and mentally exhausted. Instead
of a sympathetic response, I often get the standard line from her:
“You’ve got it easy, Sid. You teach only 15 units maximum (the
equivalent of three high school classes). And, your students are more
mature and well-behaved than high school students; they
chose
to attend your school.” In contrast, my
wife teaches the equivalent of 30 units to a “captured” audience; many
are behavior problems we would not tolerate. Moreover, she has
nutrition and noon duties, and some committee work and meetings. I
counter that while it’s true that I teach half the number of units she
does (actually less because of my release time), I do what our contract
intends us to do—I volunteer, for professional, ethical, and contractual
reasons, to work within our governance system; by law, we are a
self-governing college. Unlike secondary schools, we can have a
significant say in how our campus is run. It is the committee work
within our governance system that greatly contributes to my exhaustion.
In my first
Chaparral
article of this academic year, I concluded with “…ask not what your
Senate can do for you, but what you can do for your Senate. Turn your
concerns into positive actions. Come increase our joy while lessening
our burden. We have much to accomplish that affects us
all.”
That was, obviously, a plea for
all
of us (not just 60% of us) to do our share of the work within our
governance system, including work on the Senate and the Guild. Those of
us who do contribute get worn out because we are the 60% who are doing
the work for all of us; we are taking on much more than our share of the
burden. If everyone were to contribute, all of our burdens would be
significantly lightened.
So, where have
all the volunteers gone? Based on the proportion of full-time faculty
they represent, I computed the number of volunteers necessary from each
division to completely cover governance committees, including Senate and
Guild. I found that there were four divisions that were
under-represented in
our governance structure, and
four divisions
that were doing much more than their share:
2.5 times the representation, twice the representation, 1.5 times the
representation, and 1.5 times the representation. The remaining
divisions were proportionally represented. So, we have four divisions
“making up for” the deficit
created by four under-represented divisions.
We need the help of
all
full-time faculty to lighten everyone’s load. When the call goes out to
volunteer for Senate, Guild, and governance committees, do your fair
share. Do not ask for whom the e-mail soliciting volunteers tolls; it
tolls for thee.
I would like
to thank Dr. Ed Karpp for his assistance in preparing this article.
&
back
to top
|
|