|
Why
Did Part-time Faculty Receive a Pay Cut This Year?
Beginning
in spring of 2002, the Glendale College District began distributing
funds that were allocated in the state budget to go directly to
part-time faculty to compensate them for course preparation and
class work assessment. In our salary schedule it is a “parity
percentage” that is added onto the B-1 schedule. B-1 is the
part-time salary schedule for all part-timers except for
non-instructional adjuncts. (See link from
www.glendale.edu/guild.)
This hard-won line item in the state budget helped remunerate
adjunct faculty for the hours of work done outside of instructional
time to fulfill their teaching obligation. Full-time faculty are
paid for preparation and assessment as a part of their salaries.
During the Gray Davis era it was brought to the attention of the
legislature that adjunct faculty were glaringly underpaid for all
the work that they did in comparison to full-time faculty, and thus
this Part-time Equity line item was added to the community college
budget.
This line
item, along with two others designated to help part-time faculty,
became part of the “categorical” line items in the community college
budget. The money ear-marked for this categorical has been cut back
from one state budget to the next and never received cost-of-living
increases (COLA). However, never has it been slashed the way it was
this past year, when the legislature signed a budget that cut almost
all categorical line items by 50%. This led to 3.76% drop in adjunct
faculty pay in the Glendale district.
However,
not all part-time faculty in the state experienced this kind of pay
cut. The state budget allowed districts to reallocate the
categorical funds (many of which had been reduced) in any way that
they saw fit. In some districts this parity money was already
included in the base of part-time salary schedules, so there was no
way that districts could unilaterally withhold it from adjuncts
without negotiating for a salary reduction at the table. This was
not the case in the Glendale District, since our contract stipulated
that the equity (or parity) money could be reduced or eliminated if
the state budget took it away. If we were to roll the parity funds
into the base salary of part-timers, it would protect them from any
further cuts if parity money were to be reduced again.
In the
latest round of negotiations the full-time faculty took a .5% pay
cut for this year with a promise from the district that no further
reductions in the parity percentage would occur this year or in the
next year, even if the state budget for 2010-11 again reduces this
categorical line item. So far the governor’s budget is already
proposing a 40% further cut to the equity line item for 2010-11. We
can consider ourselves safe for now as far as pay cuts go. The
threat to the college budget, however, is continuing in this year’s
state budget.
What Can
Part-timers Do to Help Secure their Pay?
There are two ways that
part-time faculty income is affected by poor college budgets. One is
the kind of hourly pay reduction of 3.76% that we saw just this
year. But the other more serious problem is when classes are cut.
Once cut, classes are often impossible to get back on the schedule
(and since adjuncts are limited by the 67% rule, a class cut can
mean anywhere from one third to one half of their income slashed).
Every college district in the state is given funding to educate a
certain number of students per academic year. This number is called
the Full-time Equivalent Student (FTES) “cap.” Once this cap, or
number of students, is reached the college is not paid for any more
students (even if we choose to cram them into our classes).
If this “cap” is reached earlier in the academic year (which runs
from July 1 to June 30), the college will actually save money by
turning away students that we aren’t being paid for. The college
district does this by slashing course offerings.
Of course it is the
part-time faculty who often suffer the loss of assignments when this
happens. It is in the best interest of part-time faculty to spread
the number of students out throughout the year so that classes are
not cut. To do this they must put limits on how many extra students
they take into their classes. If they do not, spring offerings might
be reduced because the FTES “cap,” or allotted number of enrollees,
was met by the end of winter session.
During a growth phase the college is given
extra money to add more classes and fill classes to the brim,
because the state budget gives the college extra money to pay for
more students to be educated. This is
not a growth period and there
is no extra pay for part-timers to do what they should be paid
for—preparation and assessment—let alone for larger classes or more
sections. Keep this in mind as you see the long line of hopeful
students outside your classroom this spring. It is hard to turn away
students, but letting them add your class may cost you your job.
If you wish
to respond to this article or add your own thoughts please contact
Phyllis Eckler at
peckler@sbcglobal.net
back to top |