|
by Mona Field, Social Sciences Division
The year 2001 has been unprecedented in
many ways. First of all, after years of gradually increasing political
sophistication and involvement on the part of community college faculty,
administrators, staff, students and trustees, this was going to be OUR
year. The economic indicators had been good, and the state was predicted
to have a nice surplus for the 2001-2002 budget. We were finally going
to get the money we have long lobbied for: money for adjunct
improvements, for serious progress on the 75-25 implementation, for
increased Cal Grants for students and more.
It was a long internal educational
process, and it took over twenty years, ever since Prop 13. In 1978, the
voters drastically reduced our local funding base and set the community
colleges on a path of increasing dependence on state funding. For many
of us, it took a long time to realize that our real battleground is
Sacramento, and we had to slowly learn the Sacramento scene.
As a faculty member for nearly nineteen
years, I have witnessed the evolution in our political savvy: all those
trips to Lobby Day, all those fundraisers to elect good people to
Sacramento, all those efforts to inform a constantly changing
Legislature of our importance in the economy and social structure of
California --- we have paid our dues!
Then, January 2001: the "energy
crisis." Within a few short months last spring, the state spent
over $5 billion on bailing out power companies and keeping the lights
on. A predicted budget surplus turned into a deficit. The budget
proposed in January by the Governor, and ultimately supported by the
Legislature (despite a Republican minority holding out for a "tax
cut" in the form of a 1/4 cent reduction in the sales tax), became
toast.
For the first time in Governor Davis’
administration, the budget was late coming to him from the Legislature.
The bickering over the quarter-cent sales tax cut had slowed down a
process that he was dedicated to keeping on track. When the budget
arrived in July, the Governor did what he felt he had to: he sharpened
his blue pencil and began the funding vetoes.
Community colleges were not the only
state-funded program that got hit. Long-awaited funding for improvements
for foster care children were reduced. The UC and CSU systems took some
pain. But for us, the cuts were particularly painful. To the
consternation of virtually every community college in the state, the
cuts included two longtime budget categories: Maintenance and
Instructional Equipment. This bread- and-butter money goes for maps,
videos, computers, lab equipment, lighting systems, seismic repairs,
upgraded heating and air conditioning systems, and much more.
These basic, ongoing funds were among the
last items anyone would have expected to be reduced. Some colleges had
virtually spent the money, operating on the assumption that this budget
category was untouchable. And so in August, when many of us finally take
a break for a week or two, the unprecedented effort began.
SWINGING INTO ACTION:
Meetings were held that brought together people who had never met. In
Southern California, on a Friday morning, 24 districts came together for
a focused, well-organized discussion of exactly what could be done to
reverse the Governor’s vetoes. Suggestions ranged from involving
students and alumni to getting media coverage. Districts were
represented by college presidents, trustees, administrators, faculty and
students. Our coalition was the broadest we had ever known. Could this
mobilization really make a difference?
In the north, a similar coalition met and
formed its action plan.
The brand new network swung into action:
within a few weeks, virtually every newspaper in the state was reporting
on and editorializing on the needs of our colleges. Every level of our
system got involved: Chancellor Nussbaum, the Board of Governors,
college presidents, trustees, faculty, staff, administrators, students.
Longtime community college advocates such as Patrick McCallum, David
Viar, Bonnie Slosson, Scott Lay, Judith Michaels and others who work for
our various organizations kept us informed and involved. (I know there
are many more; this list reflects my personal information base.) The
great silent machine that drives higher education and produces millions
of productive, educated people had finally awakened!
So, instead of taking vacations, we wrote
letters to the editor, we appeared on cable TV, we wrote and phoned the
Governor and Legislature, we met with legislators in our districts, we
communicated across the state about our progress.
Many of us, myself included, felt like
Sisyphus, rolling that boulder up the hill and knowing it would come
right back down. How could we ever persuade the Governor to change his
decision? After all, we are competing with K-12 under Prop. 98, and the
Governor’s primary commitment has always been to the children in
California public schools. More than one legislator confided that they
would happily postpone the UC Merced campus for a year and help us out,
but the UC money is from a different "pot" and we could not
take advantage of their idea.
THE MIRACLE
Nonetheless, a political miracle happened. We found to our immense
delight that we had bipartisan legislative support --- virtually every
state senator and assembly member, Democrat or Republican, wanted to help
us. Daily talks occurred between our leaders and the Department of
Finance, the Governor’s office, and top legislators. Finally, the
unbelievable news came: the Governor’s office would consider some form
of restoration of the vetoed funds. This miracle was based not only on
our lobbying efforts, but also on that good old political tool, public
opinion polls. A poll commissioned by the Community College League of
California (CCLC) and FACCC told the Governor what we have known all
along: 86 percent of Californians believe in us, and they wanted us to
have our money! The level of public support for our colleges is immense,
and we finally have proof. The battle is not over. The full amount of
the cut has not been restored. As of this writing, the final decision is
not made. But the unity of our system has evolved in a way that cannot
go backwards. The strength of our voices has been heard. The connections
between all of us have been expanded. Forever more, the California
community colleges will be a presence not to be ignored.
Stay informed, stay involved. The state’s
economic situation is uncertain. Next year’s budget battle is already
shaping up, and we have no guarantees that our necessary funding will be
provided. Let’s stick together. We can make a difference.
|