CHAPARRAL

Search for an article from Chaparral

 

CPR: A New Definition?

by Mona Field, Social Sciences Division

Did you think that CPR has something to do with rescuing someone who needs resuscitation?  Well, guess again!  The new definition in California is the California Performance Review, a statewide “resuscitation” initiated by Gov. Schwarzenneger as part of his promise to “blow up the boxes” of state government.

In keeping with Republican philosophy of cutting government and saving money, the governor created a top-secret task force to make recommendations about how to reduce bureaucracy in the state.  Among the bureaucracies the “experts” recommended reducing was the Community College State Board of Governors.  Instead of this group of appointed officials, whose policy-making impacts all 109 CCs in the state, the CC system would revert to its ancient status as part of K-12 and be subsumed under the state Secretary of Education.

Does this mean we go backwards?

Well, most CC experts, including faculty leaders, boards of trustees and CEOs, have already weighed in.  The portion of the CPR recommendations for our system known as ETV 03 are a regression  into K-12, and remove us from our role as part of the higher education system of California.  (There are some other, less objectionable, recommendations in the CPR, but the focus of our CC system has been on the threat to our autonomy represented by  ETV 03).

Efficiency is great, but not at the expense of quality.

The Glendale College Board of Trustees recently passed a resolution opposing the CPR’s recommendation to eliminate our state BOG, thus joining LACCD, Pasadena, San Diego, Citrus, and numerous other districts who have gone on record as opposing this particular form of “reform.”

What would it mean to GCC if the CPR recommendations were to go through?  We can’t be certain, but to lose our own state board of governors, to be served by an under-secretary of education rather than a chancellor, all bodes poorly for our continuing battle for recognition as an economic engine of higher education.

Fortunately, the negative response of our colleges, faculty, and most legislators may keep the unfortunate CPR from becoming reality.  But the issue is not dead.  Keep informed, because we are not “resuscitated,” but rather are being drowned in an ocean of political rhetoric.

Most of us favor reforms that enhance our ability to serve students.  The CPR’s recommendations for our colleges don’t achieve that goal. &

back to top