CHAPARRAL

Search for an article from Chaparral

 

ACCREDITATION: 

Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow


  by Roger Bowerman, Accreditation Chair      

Let me start with some nostalgia time. In the “good old days,” it appeared that the Accreditation Commission of Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC) would examine an institution through its anecdote-based self study and touchy-feely onsite visit, and then come up with recommendations, which the institution could conveniently ignore or only marginally correct. When large shortcomings were pointed out, it only took a phone call from the president to convince the ACCJC leadership that the sanctions were unwarranted, and we should be left alone. The recommendations presumably sat in a binder, gathering dust, for four years before the next cycle began, and the institution would then explain why there was no significant progress in addressing the shortcomings. Institutions were apparently accredited over and over without significant work to address shortcomings—life was good.

     The good old days are over. The current environment—based on changes in the federal Department of Education that signal a desire for direct control of the accrediting process—now requires institutions to engage in an ongoing process of self-examination and self-improvement. We can no longer ignore recommendations without the fear of sanctions. If the standards are not met, then institutions can receive a variety of sanctions. Colleges throughout California now fear losing accreditation, which means they cannot get state or federal funds. The most local example of actual loss of accreditation is Compton College, now operating as a “center” of El Camino College. Colleges now actually have to act responsibly toward the students, the community, and the ACCJC. Life has changed.

     It is with alarm that I warn about the future. When I hear people say, almost flippantly, that “we will get accredited” in the spring of 2010, I actually cringe. The days of automatic accreditation are over. I am not, by nature, an alarmist, but I love this college and want it to continue as an accredited institution. I think all of you share this hope. We desire to continue teaching our students. We need the peace of mind that comes with knowing we will be paid, that GCC will continue as an institution of higher education.

     That future is not guaranteed. It is up to each and every faculty member to participate in this Senate and faculty-driven process of gathering information in order to protect ourselves from potential infringements on academic freedom. We need to demonstrate what we do and how we do it. This letter is a plea for participation, a call for cooperation, a harangue for help. As the fall semester moves forward there will be a variety of ways for you to participate in the process of gathering information—the building blocks of a successful self study. From town hall meetings to online BLOGS, you will have the opportunity to engage in this crucial process.

     But why wait for such an invitation? Contact one of the four standards chairs or myself and jump right in:

Accreditation chair Roger Bowerman bowerman@glendale.edu
Standard I,
GCC Mission and Effectiveness
Jane DiLucchio dilucchi@glendale.edu
Standard II,
Student Learning and Services
Lee Parks lparks@glendale.edu

Standard III,
Resources

Trudi Abram tabram@glendale.edu
Standard IV,
Leadership and Governance
Darren Leaver dleaver@glendale.edu

back to top