|
Glendale Community College Instructional Division
Program
Learning Outcomes Assessment Timeline
|
Please
complete a separate timeline form for
each program within your division
|
Division name:
VPA
|
|
Program name (degree, certificate, sequence of courses or series
of learning activities leading to intellectual mastery):
Studio Arts
|
Program Relationship to Glendale
Community College’s Core Competencies/Institutional Student Learning Outcomes
(ISLOs)
|
How does this program relate to
GCC’s College’s Core Competencies/Institutional Student Learning Outcomes
(ISLOs)?:
Core Competencies/ISLOs are
commonly defined as the knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes that
students are expected to develop as a result of their overall experiences
with any aspect of the college, including courses, programs, and student
services. Each program offered at GCC should
link to at least some of these Core Competencies/ISLOs. A list of the Core Competencies/ISLOs
can be found here: http://www.glendale.edu/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=4362
Include a
brief statement outlining how this program aligns with GCC’s Core
Competencies/ISLOs
|
An ideal relationship:
- Is clear and brief
- Is connected to GCC’s Core
Competencies/ISLOs
- If applicable, aligns with
professional organization(s) learning outcomes
|
|
Studio Arts provides
students foundation fine art and design instruction relevant to: transfer students interested in
liberal education; vocational students, planning to continue with a
certificate in a creative profession; and returning students interested in
life-long learning by fostering personal expression. Studio Art’s program level goals –
beyond training rigorous technical and conceptual skills – include
collaborative learning, research and critical thinking, interpersonal
communication, group and individual criticism, strong workshop practice and
visual problem solving.
Communication:
Reading, Writing, Listening, Speaking/Debating, Interpersonal Interactions –
including Visual Literacy
Information: Research Strategies, Information
Location/Retrieval, Evaluation of Information
Critical
Thinking: Evaluation, Analysis
and Synthesis, Problem Solving, Construct/Deconstruct Arguments
Global Awareness: Social and Cultural Diversity,
Artistic Expression and Variety
Personal
Responsibility: Self Management, Self Awareness, Study Skills
Application
of Knowledge: Technical Skills
|
Program Level Outcomes (PLOs)
Assessment Timeline
|
What are the Program Learning
Outcomes of this program?:
Program
Learning Outcomes (PLOs) are commonly defined as the knowledge, skills, and abilities that students have attained
as a result of their involvement in a particular set of educational experiences such as within a specific program,
degree, certificate or series of learning activities
leading to intellectual mastery
List your
PLOs below and explain the timeline by which the PLOs will be assessed
What is the PLO Assessment
Planning Timeline for this Program?:
To
develop an ongoing and systematic planning timeline, it is recommended that
you assess PLOs within a 3 year cycle (e.g. assess 1/3 of PLOs in year 1, 1/3
in year 2, and
1/3 in
year 3)
|
Ideal examples of Program Learning
Outcomes:
- Are observable and measurable
- Are program specific
- Connect to GCC’s Core
Competencies/ISLOs
- Use action verbs
- Generally a program will have
between three and six PLOs
- If applicable, aligns with
professional organization(s) learning outcomes
Ideal examples of Program Assessment
Timelines:
- Are practical, sustainable,
and geared to Core Competencies/ISLOs, and college mission
- Ensure that each PLO is
assessed regularly within a 3 year cycle
- Include teams for assessment
data collection and analysis and assessment report writing that include
faculty members who are instructors of the courses/programs assessed
|
|
List PLOs below. Generally, a program will have
between three and six PLOs.
Continue to add PLOs until you have developed an assessment timeline
for each PLO associated with this program.
|
In what semester and year will you
assess this PLO?
What data will you use to assess
it
(i.e. SLO data from courses within
the program, exam or essay data,
portfolios of student work, licensing/exit exams, etc) ?
|
Who will collect and analyze the
PLO assessment data and write a report of the findings? (Include report writer’s name and, if
possible, other participants)
|
|
PLO 1 Demonstrate
skill in a broad range of media, materials and processes
|
Spring 2013 – Portfolio review of
advanced courses, Art 161, Art 171, and Art 181
|
Attyah/St.
Ama
|
|
PLO 2 Define and use core concepts in
2D and 3D art
|
Spring 2012 – Assess via SLO data
from Art 130, Art 150, Art 152, and Art 138
|
Attyah/St. Ama
|
|
PLO 3 Produce original work the
demonstrate a high level of craft
|
Spring 2013 – Portfolio review of
advanced courses, Art 161, Art 171, and Art 181
|
Attyah/St. Ama
|
|
PLO 4 Describe, analyze and provide
criticism of works of art in various media
|
Spring 2014 – SLO Data and classroom observation collected
from core courses: Art 152, Art
153, Art 160, Art 161, Art 170, Art 180
|
Attyah/St. Ama
|
|
PL0 5 Prepare and organize art works
for portfolio review or exhibition
|
Fall 2014 – Portfolio review from
Art 179
|
Attyah/St. Ama
|
|
PLO 6 Understand safe and hazard-free
use of art materials and equipment
|
Fall 2014 – SLO data collected
from core courses: Art 130 and
Art 150
|
Attyah/St. Ama
|
|
|
|
|
Course/Program Alignment Matrix
|
How are courses in the program
aligned with the program’s learning outcomes?:
This
section should include a matrix of the PLOs for your program and a list of
each course which is a part of the program
- For each course indicate if
PLO is addressed within it the level at which it is addressed by either
leaving it blank (if not addressed in program)
or noting I, D, or M
- Introduce = I PLO is
introduced at a basic level
- D = Develop Students
are given opportunities to practice, learn more about, and receive
feedback to develop more sophistication
- M = Mastery Students demonstrate mastery
at a level appropriate for graduation
|
Ideal alignment:
- Course/Program matrix
indicates that PLOs are embedded in program’s coursework
- PLOs are introduced,
developed, and mastered within the range of courses
- Each course addresses one or
more of the PLOs; however, rarely does a course address all PLOs
|
|
Course name and number e.g. Magic
101: Elementary Magic
|
PLO 1
|
PLO 2
|
PLO 3
|
PLO 4
|
PLO 5
|
PLO 6
|
|
Art 130
|
I
|
I
|
I
|
I
|
I
|
I
|
|
Art 131
|
I
|
D
|
I
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 133
|
D, M
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 138
|
I, D
|
I
|
D
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 150
|
I
|
I
|
I
|
I
|
I
|
I
|
|
Art 151
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 152
|
D
|
M
|
D
|
I
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 153
|
D,M
|
M
|
D
|
I
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 154
|
D, M
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 155
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 160
|
I, D
|
I, D
|
D
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 161
|
D, M
|
D
|
M
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 162
|
D, M
|
D, M
|
M
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 163
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 164
|
I, D
|
D
|
D
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 165
|
D, M
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 170
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 171
|
D, M
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 179
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
|
Art 180
|
D, M
|
D
|
D
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 181
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 240
|
I, D
|
D
|
D
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
|
Art 241
|
D, M
|
M
|
M
|
M
|
D
|
M
|
As you fill out this
alignment matrix, gaps may occur or become visible. Use the gaps to help your determine which course or program
SLOs may need to be revised so that all courses and programs are aligned. Question 2.2 in your program’s Program
Review report provides a means to explain if you noted any gaps in alignment
and, if yes, how your division might revise course or program SLOs to ensure
that all course and program learning outcomes are aligned.